18/02/2026
🚫 Roof Dilapidation Report: Cheap Retrofit, Expensive Consequences
In the name of cost cutting, asset owners or tenants — and often third-party contractors — will sometimes attempt to install roof pe*******ons and flashings themselves, or engage non-licensed contractors simply because they’re cheaper than a licensed roofer.
Almost every time, this decision comes back to bite. Installations like these ones often go under the radar, especially with no consultation or quality assurance check organised by an asset owner.
What looks like a short-term saving typically turns into:
• Ongoing water ingress
• Tenant complaints
• Costly rectification works
• Premature failure of roof components
The newly installed pe*******on and flashing details inspected here installed showed immediate and obvious defects, including:
⚠️ Multiple conduits forced through a single dektite instead of individual dektites
⚠️ Incorrect fixings
⚠️ Failing join details with lack of underseal
⚠️ Incompatible materials in contact with the roof sheet
⚠️ Poor flashing turn-downs
⚠️ Missing dry pans
These details are not warrantable and do not comply with industry standards or manufacturer guidelines. As a result, the pe*******ons and flashings now need to be completely removed and reinstalled correctly to achieve a watertight, compliant outcome.
🔑 The takeaway:
A trusted, licensed roofing contractor isn’t a cost — they’re risk management.
Engaging the right roofing professional to oversee any roof modification, retrofit, or upgrade — particularly where third-party equipment is involved — pays dividends for asset owners in the long run.