05/25/2026
Why billionaire Taylor Swift could be on the hook for Travis Kelceâs living expenses after wedding
Billionaire Taylor Swift might be on the hook for Travis Kelceâs living expenses after they tie the knot.
Page Six exclusively spoke with attorney Sarah Luetto about how their prenuptial agreement could look â considering Swift is worth much more money than the NFL player.
âWhen one party is worth significantly more than the other, prenuptial agreements frequently provide that the wealthier party will pay all of the coupleâs living expenses while the less wealthy party preserves their separate estate,â Luetto, partner in Blank Romeâs matrimonial and family law group, told us. The lawyer, who does not represent either party, explained that some agreements also entail the wealthier person âgifting or transmuting a portion of their estate to the community or to the other partyâs separate property.â
This would allow âeach party to maintain investments and assets during the marriage,â Luetto said, adding, âThe amounts transmuted or gifted often increase over time, reflecting the duration of the marriage.â
While there are major disparities between Swift and Kelceâs respective estates, weâre told that they both hold intellectual property and other assets that are âinherently difficult to value and divide in a dissolution of marriage.â âGiven the complexities of their respective estates â and the lengths Swift has gone to in order to buy back her masters and protect her music catalog â it is likely that any prenuptial agreement would keep their respective estates entirely separate, regardless of any efforts made by either party to enhance the otherâs estate during the marriage,â Luetto said.
The arrangement would make a dissolution âmuch simplerâ with both âretaining their own estate.â
Their agreement may also include terms that would not prevent them from entering into joint ventures or purchasing assets jointly.
âThey would simply need to clarify their ownership interests in any jointly held assets on a case-by-case basis,â Luetto explained.
The fact that they each have multiple residences in different states is another factor, as they might consider whether to include choice-of-law provisions â clauses in a contract that state which jurisdictionâs laws will be interpreted and enforced if thereâs a dispute â in their prenup.
Swift owns homes in New York City, Rhode Island, Nashville and Los Angeles.
Kelce, for his part, has properties in Leawood, Kansas, and Kansas City, Missouri. He also reportedly shares a home with his family in Orlando, Florida.