19/08/2026
The The Guardian article by about the approach to restoration works of the showcases the reality of architecture and design legacy of valued architects, decades after their passing. For admirers of the “12-year saga of destruction, rebuilding and yet more destruction” is heartbreaking. The astronomical cost for rebuilding by conserving Mackintosh’s original vision and design aesthetic is mind blowing, yet not altogether surprising.
The fact that the speed and extent of damage caused by the fires on two occasions highlights the importance of specifying products with fire resisting properties and incorporating fire safety measures to protect buildings even for heritage projects. Buildings are real-life case studies for both students and practitioners of architecture alike; the legacy of art and design passed on to future generations to learn from the past. If this is to remain true, the conservation and restoration of such buildings should also be well considered.
This process can be used to teach future generations how to futureproof architecture; to adapt and evolve over time whilst staying true to the original vision and design intent. What are your thoughts on this?
https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2026/jul/24/mackintosh-building-fire-restoration-glasgow-school-of-art-scotland
Stratospheric costs could prevent the fire-damaged landmark from returning to its former glory. Now, unless a wealthy patron is found, the building seems destined for ‘soulless’ facade retention or ‘curated decay’
